The New Poets of Indian English Poetry: Self-Expression, Modernism, Nature and Myth
Introduction: The Emergence of the New Indian Poetic Voice
Indian English poetry underwent a significant transformation in the decades following Independence. Earlier Indian poets writing in English, such as Henry Derozio, Toru Dutt, Sri Aurobindo, Sarojini Naidu and Rabindranath Tagore, had already demonstrated that English could be used to articulate Indian experiences. However, the poets who emerged prominently during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s brought a distinctly modern consciousness to Indian English poetry.
The new poets moved away from grand romantic descriptions, excessive nationalism and conventional poetic forms. Instead, they explored ordinary life, individual identity, urban experience, sexuality, alienation, memory, family, religion, poverty, death and cultural conflict. Their poetry was frequently personal and experimental. They were not interested in simply proving that Indians could write “good English”; rather, they wanted English to become a flexible medium for expressing specifically Indian experiences.
The emergence of the Writers' Workshop in Calcutta in 1958, associated with P. Lal, was particularly important in creating an environment for experimentation in Indian English writing. The modern Indian poet increasingly regarded English not merely as a colonial inheritance but as a language that could be appropriated, modified and transformed.
K. R. S. Iyengar's observation that “An Indo-Anglian poet strives for self-expression in English” becomes particularly relevant in this context. The phrase captures the central paradox of Indian English poetry: the poet possesses an Indian cultural identity but expresses it through a language historically associated with British colonialism.
The poetry of Nissim Ezekiel, Kamala Das, A. K. Ramanujan, Arun Kolatkar, Jayanta Mahapatra and others demonstrates how successfully this paradox became a source of creativity.
1. Our Modernist Anthology of Indian English Poetry
One of the most important anthologies for understanding modern Indian English poetry is R. Parthasarathy's Ten Twentieth-Century Indian Poets. First published in 1976, it became one of the most widely used anthologies of modern Indian poetry in English. The anthology brings together ten major poets and gives representative selections from their poetry.
The poets and representative poems included are:
 |
| Image Source: Keki N. Daruwalla |
Keki N. Daruwalla
“The Epileptic”
“The Ghaghra in Spate”
“Fire-Hymn”
“Routine”
“Death of a Bird”
 |
| Image Source: Kamala Das |
Kamala Das
Nissim Ezekiel
“Enterprise”Image Source: Nissim Ezekiel “Philosophy”
“Night of the Scorpion”
“Poet, Lover, Birdwatcher”
“The Visitor”
“Background, Casually”
“Goodbye Party for Miss Pushpa T. S.”
“Poem of the Separation”
 |
| Image Source: Arun Kolatkar |
Arun Kolatkar
“the boatride”
 |
| Image Source: Shiv K. Kumar |
Shiv K. Kumar
“Indian Women”
“My Co-respondent”
“Pilgrimage”
“Days in New York”
“Kali”
Image Source: Jayant Mahapatra
Jayanta Mahapatra
“Indian Summer”
Arvind Krishna Mehrotra
“The Sale”
“Continuities”
“A Letter to a Friend”
“Remarks of an Early Biographer”
Image Source: R. Parthsarathy
R. Parthasarathy
“Exile”
Image Source: Gieve Patel
Gieve Patel
“On Killing a Tree”
“Servants”
“Nargol”
“Naryal Purnima”
“Commerce”
“O My Very Own Cadaver”
Image Source: A.K. Ramanujan
A. K. Ramanujan
“Looking for a Cousin on a Swing”
The contents of Parthasarathy's anthology demonstrate the diversity of modern Indian English poetry.
The selections also reveal something important about the New Poets: there is no single definition of “Indian poetry.” Daruwalla's poetry is frequently historical and violent; Das is intensely personal and feminist; Ezekiel is urban and ironic; Kolatkar is sceptical and visual; Mahapatra is regional and existential; Ramanujan is cultural and introspective; and Gieve Patel often brings human bodies, violence and nature into uncomfortable proximity.
A few lines from these poets demonstrate this diversity.
Ezekiel begins “Night of the Scorpion” with the strikingly simple statement:
“I remember the night my motherwas stung by a scorpion.”
The poem transforms an ordinary domestic event into a meditation on superstition, rationality, religion and maternal love.
Gieve Patel's “On Killing a Tree” begins:
“It takes much longer than you think.”
The apparently simple statement gradually becomes an ironic reflection on violence and the persistence of nature.
Kamala Das's poetry is much more intimate and autobiographical. In “An Introduction,” she asserts her right to speak in her own language and make that language her own. Her poetry turns the personal body and private emotions into subjects worthy of serious poetic treatment.
Ramanujan's “Obituary” begins with the death of the father but expands into a meditation on family memory, inheritance and cultural tradition.
These examples demonstrate why the New Poets are important. Their poems do not attempt to create one idealised picture of India. Instead, they present many Indias—urban India, rural India, religious India, sceptical India, middle-class India, female India, regional India and psychologically fragmented India.
2. K. R. S. Iyengar and the Idea of Self-Expression
K. R. S. Iyengar's statement that “An Indo-Anglian poet strives for self-expression in English” is one of the most useful ways of understanding modern Indian English poetry.
The important word here is “self-expression.”
Iyengar is not simply saying that Indian poets write in English. He is suggesting that English becomes the medium through which the Indian poet discovers and expresses an individual identity.
This creates a fascinating linguistic situation. English entered India through colonial history, yet Indian writers gradually transformed it into an Indian literary language.
The New Poets did not simply imitate British English poetry. They adapted English to Indian places, Indian memories, Indian speech patterns, Indian cultural practices and Indian psychological experiences.
Three poets particularly demonstrate this process: Nissim Ezekiel, Kamala Das and A. K. Ramanujan.
Nissim Ezekiel: Making English Indian
Nissim Ezekiel is one of the clearest examples of Iyengar's idea.
Ezekiel's poetry is deeply connected with Bombay, the city in which he lived and which became central to his poetic imagination. His poems frequently represent middle-class life, Indian social behaviour, ordinary conversations and the tensions of modern urban existence.
In “Night of the Scorpion,” Ezekiel brings together villagers, religious belief, superstition, rationalism and maternal love. The language is simple, but the poem contains considerable cultural complexity.
His poem “Goodbye Party for Miss Pushpa T. S.” is even more revealing. Ezekiel imitates Indian English speech patterns to create humour. The poem sounds like an ordinary Indian speaker giving a farewell speech.
Rather than correcting Indian English into British English, Ezekiel makes Indian English itself part of the poetic subject.
His achievement therefore lies in Indianising the English language.
English becomes the language of Bombay streets, Indian middle-class society and everyday Indian conversation.
This is precisely what Iyengar means by self-expression. Ezekiel does not merely express himself through English; he transforms English so that it can express his Indian environment.
Kamala Das: English and the Feminine Self
Kamala Das represents another, more intensely personal dimension of Iyengar's statement.
Her poetry is concerned with love, marriage, sexuality, loneliness, female identity and the search for an authentic self.
In “An Introduction,” she directly addresses the problem of language. She refuses the idea that English cannot belong to her simply because it is not her mother tongue. Her declaration is one of linguistic ownership:
“The language I speakbecomes mine.”
This is a revolutionary poetic position.
Das does not ask permission to use English. She takes possession of it.
Her poetry therefore demonstrates that English can become a language of Indian female experience. The private experiences of the woman—the body, desire, marriage, loneliness and emotional dissatisfaction—become legitimate poetic subjects.
Her famous assertion that her language is “half English, half Indian” is particularly significant. The phrase represents the hybrid nature of Indian English identity.
Das's English is neither completely British nor completely Indian in a narrow linguistic sense. It is a personal language created through cultural and emotional experience.
Her poetry therefore fulfils Iyengar's idea at the deepest level: English becomes an instrument for self-discovery and self-assertion.
A. K. Ramanujan: English as Cultural Memory
A. K. Ramanujan provides a third form of self-expression.
Ramanujan was deeply influenced by Kannada and Tamil literary traditions, Indian folklore, classical literature and family memory. His poetry frequently moves between the contemporary English-speaking world and the cultural memories of India.
In “Small-Scale Reflections on a Great House,” the traditional Indian family becomes the subject of a humorous and ironic meditation.
In “Obituary,” the death of the father becomes an occasion for examining family memory, cultural inheritance and the strange continuity between the living and the dead.
Ramanujan's English is precise, economical and intellectually controlled. He often says much through very few words.
His bilingual background is crucial to understanding his poetry. English allows him to communicate with an international literary audience, while Indian languages and traditions provide the cultural structures underneath his poetry.
Ramanujan therefore represents cultural self-expression.
If Ezekiel makes English urban and Indian, and Das makes English personal and feminist, Ramanujan makes English a language of cultural memory.
Together, these three poets demonstrate three different meanings of Iyengar's statement:
Ezekiel — urban and linguistic self-expression
Kamala Das — personal and feminist self-expression
A. K. Ramanujan — cultural and psychological self-expression
3. Jayanta Mahapatra: Landscape, Memory and Existential Anxiety
Jayanta Mahapatra occupies a unique position among modern Indian English poets because his poetry is deeply rooted in Odisha.
Puri, Cuttack, Konark, temples, rivers, the sea, rain, poverty, hunger and ordinary people repeatedly appear in his poetry. His Odisha is not merely a geographical location. It becomes a psychological and symbolic landscape.
Recent scholarship continues to emphasise the importance of Odisha to Mahapatra's poetic imagination. His regional landscape becomes a way of exploring larger questions about Indian society, identity, poverty, religion and human suffering.
Mahapatra's poetry is frequently dark, restrained and introspective. He does not present nature as a beautiful escape from reality. Instead, nature often reflects the anxiety and suffering of human beings.
His landscape is therefore an inner landscape.
Odisha as a Poetic Landscape
In poems such as “Indian Summer,” “Dawn at Puri,” “A Missing Person” and “Hunger,” the physical environment becomes inseparable from psychological experience.
The sea can suggest loneliness.
The temple can suggest both faith and doubt.
Rain can suggest renewal but also sadness.
The landscape of Odisha becomes a place where personal memory and social reality intersect.
This is one reason Mahapatra's poetry is simultaneously regional and universal.
He writes about Odisha, but his deeper subjects are human: loneliness, desire, guilt, death, hunger, memory and the search for meaning.
“Hunger”: Poverty and the Body
“Hunger” is one of Mahapatra's most disturbing poems.
The poem presents a poor fisherman and his young daughter. Economic desperation becomes inseparable from sexual exploitation. Mahapatra does not romanticise poverty; instead, he exposes its brutal consequences.
The poem begins with the image:
“It was hard to believe the flesh was heavy on my back.”
The word “flesh” is particularly important. The human body is reduced to physical weight, hunger and economic value.
The poem therefore connects several forms of hunger:
physical hunger,
sexual desire,
economic desperation,
emotional loneliness and
moral hunger.
Mahapatra's poetry is powerful precisely because he refuses to offer an easy moral solution.
Religion and Doubt
Religion is another major concern in Mahapatra.
His poems often contain temples, priests, rituals and sacred landscapes. Yet his attitude toward religion is rarely uncomplicated.
In “Dawn at Puri,” the sacred world exists alongside poverty and death. The famous Jagannath temple becomes surrounded by ordinary human suffering.
Mahapatra therefore places the sacred and the material side by side.
His question is not simply whether religion is true or false. His deeper concern is whether religious belief can adequately respond to human suffering.
This makes his poetry profoundly modernist.
Silence and Style
Mahapatra's poetry often avoids dramatic declarations.
His language is quiet.
His images are carefully selected.
His poems frequently contain pauses, silences and unresolved endings.
This silence is not emptiness. It is part of the meaning.
The reader is required to participate in the poem and interpret what remains unsaid.
His poetic style can therefore be characterised by:
free verse,
compressed imagery,
symbolic landscapes,
psychological introspection,
ambiguity,
silence,
religious questioning,
erotic tension,
social criticism and
existential anxiety.
Mahapatra's achievement lies in transforming local landscape into universal human experience.
4. A. K. Ramanujan and Arun Kolatkar: Nature and Myth
A particularly productive comparison can be made between A. K. Ramanujan and Arun Kolatkar.
Both poets use Indian cultural material, but they approach nature and myth differently.
Ramanujan generally approaches nature through memory, family and cultural consciousness, whereas Kolatkar often approaches it through observation, irony and scepticism.
A. K. Ramanujan: Nature as Memory
Ramanujan's treatment of nature is very different from the Romantic tradition.
For Wordsworth, nature can provide spiritual consolation.
For Ramanujan, nature is often an ordinary presence embedded in everyday Indian life.
A river, tree, insect, house or animal can trigger memories of childhood, family and culture.
His poem “A River” is an excellent example.
The river in Madurai has been celebrated by generations of poets, but Ramanujan refuses to romanticise it. Instead, he presents the river as part of a city where human life and suffering continue regardless of poetic tradition.
Nature becomes a witness to human existence.
This is a characteristic feature of Ramanujan's modernism: he questions conventional poetic representations rather than accepting them.
Ramanujan and Myth
Myth occupies an equally important place in Ramanujan's intellectual world.
His engagement with Indian mythology can also be seen in his scholarship and translations. His famous essay “Three Hundred Ramayanas” argues against the assumption that there is only one fixed version of the Ramayana.
For Ramanujan, myths change according to region, language, community and cultural context.
This principle is also present in his poetry.
Myth is not presented as an unquestionable truth. Instead, it becomes something that modern individuals inherit, reinterpret and sometimes question.
Therefore, Ramanujan's treatment of myth can be described as critical traditionalism.
He respects tradition but does not surrender his critical intelligence to it.
Arun Kolatkar: Nature, Ruins and the Modern Eye
Arun Kolatkar's Jejuri provides one of the most distinctive treatments of pilgrimage and myth in Indian English poetry.
The sequence follows a modern traveller visiting Jejuri, a pilgrimage centre associated with Khandoba in Maharashtra.
But this is not a conventional devotional poem.
The traveller is sceptical.
He notices buses, stones, insects, ruined structures, priests, monkeys, tourists and ordinary people.
The sacred landscape is repeatedly interrupted by the ordinary.
This creates Kolatkar's distinctive poetic effect.
Recent scholarship has described Jejuri as a work that challenges conventional postcolonial readings through its mixture of local and global, cultural and trans-historical perspectives. Another study identifies its central tension as the conflict between myth and reality and between faith and scepticism.
The Ordinary and the Sacred
In “The Bus,” the pilgrimage begins with an ordinary bus journey.
This is significant.
Kolatkar does not begin with divine revelation.
He begins with public transport.
The sacred journey is therefore mediated through an extremely ordinary modern experience.
In “Makarand,” flowers, stones and religious objects become part of the strange landscape of Jejuri.
The result is a poetry in which the sacred is neither completely accepted nor completely rejected.
Kolatkar's modern traveller sees the physical reality of the place before accepting its mythology.
Myth and Scepticism in Kolatkar
Kolatkar's treatment of myth is ironic.
He does not simply destroy mythology.
Instead, he places mythology under pressure.
The traditional stories surrounding Khandoba continue to exist, but the modern visitor encounters cracked stones, barren landscapes, ruins and ordinary human behaviour.
The gap between the legendary Jejuri and the physical Jejuri becomes the central source of poetic tension.
This is why Jejuri is neither a devotional collection nor a straightforward attack on religion.
It is a modern encounter between belief and doubt.
5. Ramanujan and Kolatkar: A Comparative Analysis
Although both poets use Indian tradition, their methods are significantly different.
The difference can be summarised simply:
Ramanujan asks how tradition lives inside modern memory.
Kolatkar asks what happens when a modern sceptic encounters tradition.
Both poets therefore demonstrate that modern Indian English poetry does not have to reject tradition in order to be modern.
Modernism can also mean re-reading tradition from a new perspective.
Conclusion: Many Voices, One Modern Indian Consciousness
The New Poets transformed Indian English poetry by giving it a new relationship with the self.
They did not simply write about India. They explored what it meant to be an individual living within India's complex linguistic, cultural, religious and social worlds.
K. R. S. Iyengar's statement that an Indo-Anglian poet “strives for self-expression in English” therefore becomes the central idea through which this poetry can be understood.
Nissim Ezekiel made English speak the language of urban India.
Kamala Das transformed English into a language of female selfhood and emotional honesty.
A. K. Ramanujan used English to explore family, memory, mythology and cultural inheritance.
Arun Kolatkar brought modern scepticism into the world of pilgrimage and myth.
Jayanta Mahapatra transformed Odisha into a landscape of memory, desire, poverty, religion and existential anxiety.
The great achievement of these poets is that they did not remain trapped between “Indian” and “English.” They created something new: Indian English modernism.
Their poetry demonstrates that a language does not remain permanently tied to the culture that originally introduced it. A language can be appropriated, reshaped and made personal.
English becomes Indian when Indian poets make it speak their landscapes, memories, bodies, myths, doubts and everyday lives.
That is perhaps the most important legacy of the New Poets: they did not merely write Indian poetry in English. They transformed English into a language through which modern India could speak about itself.
Works Cited
Arakere, Sunidhi. “Liminality and the ‘Commons’ in Selected Poems by Jayanta Mahapatra.” mLAC Journal for Arts, Commerce and Sciences, vol. 4, no. 5, 2026, pp. 250–55.
Bird, Emma. “Re-reading Postcolonial Poetry: Arun Kolatkar’s Jejuri.” The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, vol. 47, no. 2, 2012, pp. 217–33. SAGE Journals, doi:10.1177/0021989412446018.
Chaudhuri, Rosinka, editor. A History of Indian Poetry in English. Cambridge UP, 2016.
Chindhade, Shirish. Five Indian English Poets: Nissim Ezekiel, A. K. Ramanujan, Arun Kolatkar, Dilip Chitre, R. Parthasarathy. Atlantic Publishers, 1996.
Das, Kamala. Summer in Calcutta. Everest Press, 1965.
Dutta, Amar. “Arun Kolatkar’s Jejuri: A Conflict between Myth and Reality, Faith and Scepticism.” Zenodo, 2018.
Ezekiel, Nissim. Collected Poems. Oxford UP, 1989.
Iyengar, K. R. Srinivasa. Indian Writing in English. 5th ed., Sterling Publishers, 1985.
Kolatkar, Arun. Jejuri. Clearing House, 1976.
Mahapatra, Jayanta. A Rain of Rites. University of Georgia Press, 1976.
Naik, M. K. A History of Indian English Literature. Sahitya Akademi, 2009.
Parthasarathy, R., editor. Ten Twentieth-Century Indian Poets. Oxford UP, 1976.
Ramanujan, A. K. The Collected Poems of A. K. Ramanujan. Oxford UP, 1995.
Ramanujan, A. K. “Three Hundred Ramayanas: Five Examples and Three Thoughts on Translation.” Many Ramayanas: The Diversity of a Narrative Tradition in South Asia, edited by Paula Richman, University of California Press, 1991, pp. 22–48.
